Van Gogh and Zhang Daqian were both master artists in their respective cultures. What do their works have in common?
– By Dr. Huang

Van Gogh and Zhang Daqian lived in vastly different cultural, historical, and aesthetic worlds—one rooted in Western post-impressionism, the other in classical Chinese ink painting and modern reinterpretation. Yet both are revered not just for their technical skill, but for something deeper: their emotional authorship.

1. Painting as personal testimony

Both artists used the canvas not just to depict, but to express:

• Van Gogh’s swirling skies, heavy brushstrokes, and intense color fields weren’t just visual—they were psychological weather maps.
• Zhang Daqian’s shifting between classical shan shui (mountain-water) and later splashed ink technique was an evolving mirror of his identity, exile, and experimentation.

In both cases, style wasn’t decoration—it was confession.

2. Nature as emotional language

Though their mediums differed, both artists turned to landscape not as background, but as the protagonist of emotion:

• Van Gogh’s cypress trees and wheat fields burn with internal struggle.
• Zhang Daqian’s misty mountains and void-heavy compositions evoke solitude, transience, and grandeur.

Nature in their work becomes a stand-in for the self, and the viewer is invited to feel rather than analyze.

3. Rebellion within tradition

Neither artist was content to follow established rules:

• Van Gogh pushed beyond realism and into expressionism, ahead of his time.
• Zhang Daqian, while trained in classical Chinese traditions, later broke them with bold splashed-ink abstractions, influenced in part by Western modernism.

Both used tradition as a foundation—but not a cage.

4. Universality through subjectivity

What makes both painters timeless is not how they represented reality, but how they invited others into theirs. They showed that emotion is not confined by medium, culture, or geography.
Their brushwork is radically different—but their intent is deeply human.

---

One-liner takeaway:
True artistry is not about matching the world—it’s about revealing how the world lives within the artist.

Great games are built on emotional investment, not just mechanics. If a character’s presence in the world feels passive, interchangeable, or irrelevant, they are dead on arrival—even if technically animated.

1. Ordinary is invisible

When everything about a character is “normal,” players instinctively ignore them:

• They don’t have goals
• They don’t cause friction
• They don’t affect the world

This doesn’t mean every NPC needs to be dramatic or loud. It means every character must have a reason to be remembered.

If you can replace them with a signpost and nothing changes, they don’t belong in the game.

2. Case example: Undertale’s shopkeepers

Undertale is full of small NPCs, but none of them are “just there.” The shopkeeper is a tired bunny mom. The skeleton brothers are comedians and tragic figures. The ordinary guard has romantic tension with his colleague.

Each one breaks the mold of “just a role.” They have opinions, backstories, quirks. Even if they only say one line, that line sticks.

The player cares—because the world cares.

3. Narrative energy comes from tension

What makes a character worth caring about is not the amount of screen time, but the contrast they bring:

• A coward in a world of heroes
• A dreamer in a world of machines
• A liar who tells one beautiful truth

“Flat” means no dramatic pressure. Memorable means some form of struggle or contradiction.

4. Design rule: Every NPC needs at least one hook

If you want players to care:

• Give the NPC a want (even a silly one)
• Put them in tension with their environment
• Let them surprise the player at least once

No drama = no memory.

---

One-liner takeaway:
The player has a limited spotlight. Don’t waste it on someone with nothing to say.

The Game Designer’s Guide to Creating Instant Delight, Surprise, and Emotional Peaks.

Read it here: https://gamedesign.hongmoe.com/wiki/designing-wow-moments-in-games/